Bitcoin ETF Flows Face Record Outflows Amid Market Shifts
Institutional interest in Bitcoin ETFs has hit a notable slowdown, with U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recording net outflows of $278 million on June 5, marking one of the worst days for ETF flows in recent memory. This comes as hedge funds and fast-money managers unwind arbitrage-driven strategies that initially fueled demand for these products.
Millennium Management, once a major holder of the iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT), reduced its position by 41% and exited its stake in the Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF (BTCO). Similarly, Brevan Howard and the State of Wisconsin Investment Board have scaled back their exposure, signaling a broader retrenchment among institutional players.
The collapse of the BTC futures basis trade, which incentivized long spot ETF and short futures pairings, has been a key driver of this shift. The annualized premium in CME futures over spot prices fell from 15% earlier in the year to near zero by the end of Q1 2025, eroding the profitability of these strategies.
Corporate Bitcoin Holdings Gain Momentum
While institutional Bitcoin ETF flows have cooled, corporate interest in direct Bitcoin holdings remains robust. Companies like Trump Media Group and GameStop have opted to hold Bitcoin directly on their balance sheets rather than through ETFs. This trend underscores a growing preference for strategic reserves of the top digital asset.
Abu Dhabi’s Mubadala sovereign wealth fund increased its IBIT stake to 8.7 million shares, valued at approximately $409 million, while Brown University added a $4.9 million position. These moves highlight the divergence between short-term hedge fund strategies and long-term institutional allocations.
Despite the recent outflows, year-to-date net inflows into Bitcoin ETFs still total $9 billion, reflecting sustained interest from certain investor classes. However, the evolving investor mix suggests that the rapid early growth driven by arbitrage funds may not be sustainable.
BlackRock’s Ethereum Pivot Signals Institutional Shift
Amid the turbulence in Bitcoin ETF flows, BlackRock has made a strategic move into Ethereum. The asset manager purchased $34.7 million worth of ETH, marking a significant pivot in institutional sentiment. This comes as Bitcoin ETF inflows falter, with IBIT logging zero net inflows on June 5—a stark contrast to its previous streak of steady capital accumulation.
The timing of BlackRock’s Ethereum acquisition suggests a portfolio realignment strategy rather than a wholesale exit from crypto exposure. Ethereum’s rising network activity, strong staking metrics, and decentralized finance (DeFi) growth have bolstered its appeal among institutional investors.
Bloomberg analysts predict that U.S. spot Ethereum ETFs could gain approval by the second half of 2025, further driving interest in the asset. BlackRock’s direct ETH allocation may be a strategic move to front-run potential fund launches, signaling confidence in Ethereum’s long-term prospects.
Why It Matters
The shifting dynamics in Bitcoin ETF flows and the rise of direct corporate holdings highlight the evolving strategies of institutional investors. While hedge funds retreat from arbitrage-driven trades, long-term allocators and corporations are stepping in to fill the gap.
BlackRock’s pivot to Ethereum underscores the growing diversification within institutional crypto portfolios. As Bitcoin faces increased volatility and political scrutiny, Ethereum’s resilience and expanding use cases make it an attractive alternative.
The next 13F filings in July will provide further clarity on whether these trends continue, offering insights into the long-term positioning of institutional players in the crypto market. For young, crypto-curious investors, understanding these shifts is crucial to staying ahead in an increasingly complex landscape.
© 2025 OKX. This article may be reproduced or distributed in its entirety, or excerpts of 100 words or less of this article may be used, provided such use is non-commercial. Any reproduction or distribution of the entire article must also prominently state: “This article is © 2025 OKX and is used with permission.” Permitted excerpts must cite to the name of the article and include attribution, for example “Article Name, [author name if applicable], © 2025 OKX.” No derivative works or other uses of this article are permitted.
